Softaculous http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php? <![CDATA[2002/2004 port not working anymore]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7387&tpg=1#p25570 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:00:28 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7387&tpg=1#p25570 <![CDATA[2002/2004 port not working anymore]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7387&tpg=1#p25569
Since I enabled ngnix reverse proxy with apache2 and rebooted my server everything seems to be up and running except the admin panels.

I have done service webuzo restart also which done nothing.

I just receive:

404 Not Found

nginx/1.6.2
]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:48:52 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7387&tpg=1#p25569
<![CDATA[Enable Virtio block device]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25568
Quote From : alons Today at 3:25 pm
Quote From : mitgib Today at 12:07 pm
Quote From : alons Today at 11:56 am

When Virtio is disabled many a times, the VPS would not boot as the VPS disk name changes accordingly i.e. from /dev/sda to /dev/vda.

Hence it was better to disable virtio rather than have complaints for a VPS not booting after virtio is enabled/disabled.
We infact had many tickets about this and hence we disabled the option while editing.

You have not listed anything about security, your initial reason for not making the option editable.

You have only listed support issues.

2.6.32 RHEL kernels and Ubuntu and Debian auto sense virtio.  The ability to change between virtio is a feature SolusVM has had for years.  You need to stay consistent with your story, as what I am seeing here is amature backpeddling.

Hi,

Its definitely not a security issue. I guess Asim used the term wrongly.
The issue is that a VPS fails to boot if virtio is enabled and one disables it.
I guess we can have an option to enable it, but not disable it.
What do you think ?

Regards

Making it so I can enabled it would be a start. I am avoiding Virtualizor right now as without this, I cannot migrate 40 nodes worth of clients and convert them to sparse files as I update the node to Ubuntu.  I am looking at a large job, so a little help from your side would go a long way. 



]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:31:30 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25568
<![CDATA[Virtualization Types on Virtualizor CP]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7316&tpg=1#p25567
Quote From : BusyBee March 18, 2015, 3:42 pm
thks for the reply.

it would be nice if your company can provide future features, so customers could see whats virtualizor team doing on the next development...

regards,

BusyBee
We will see if this can be done.
But at the moment, it will take time.

Regards,
Alons]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:26:58 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7316&tpg=1#p25567
<![CDATA[Enable Virtio block device]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25566
Quote From : mitgib Today at 12:07 pm
Quote From : alons Today at 11:56 am

When Virtio is disabled many a times, the VPS would not boot as the VPS disk name changes accordingly i.e. from /dev/sda to /dev/vda.

Hence it was better to disable virtio rather than have complaints for a VPS not booting after virtio is enabled/disabled.
We infact had many tickets about this and hence we disabled the option while editing.

You have not listed anything about security, your initial reason for not making the option editable.

You have only listed support issues.

2.6.32 RHEL kernels and Ubuntu and Debian auto sense virtio.  The ability to change between virtio is a feature SolusVM has had for years.  You need to stay consistent with your story, as what I am seeing here is amature backpeddling.

Hi,

Its definitely not a security issue. I guess Asim used the term wrongly.
The issue is that a VPS fails to boot if virtio is enabled and one disables it.
I guess we can have an option to enable it, but not disable it.
What do you think ?

Regards]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:25:08 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25566
<![CDATA[Enable Virtio block device]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25564
Quote From : alons Today at 11:56 am

When Virtio is disabled many a times, the VPS would not boot as the VPS disk name changes accordingly i.e. from /dev/sda to /dev/vda.

Hence it was better to disable virtio rather than have complaints for a VPS not booting after virtio is enabled/disabled.
We infact had many tickets about this and hence we disabled the option while editing.

You have not listed anything about security, your initial reason for not making the option editable.

You have only listed support issues.

2.6.32 RHEL kernels and Ubuntu and Debian auto sense virtio.  The ability to change between virtio is a feature SolusVM has had for years.  You need to stay consistent with your story, as what I am seeing here is amature backpeddling.]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:07:04 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25564
<![CDATA[Enable Virtio block device]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25563
Quote From : ZXHost March 25, 2015, 9:28 pm
Quote From : mitgib March 25, 2015, 8:19 am
Quote From : asim_shaikh March 25, 2015, 5:49 am
Hi,

Virtio can be enabled for block device in virtualizor while creating the VPS in the advance options, however  we have disabled it while editing the VPS for security reasons.
Provide your source for security concerns, I cannot find any unresolved bugs in the past 5 years for this.  Only old bugs were for large >1.5TB qcow2 but was resolved in qemu-kvm 0.12.5

I would also be interested in the reason behind this, I can understand maybe a warning message for example if it's a Windows OS without Virtio drivers.

When Virtio is disabled many a times, the VPS would not boot as the VPS disk name changes accordingly i.e. from /dev/sda to /dev/vda.

Hence it was better to disable virtio rather than have complaints for a VPS not booting after virtio is enabled/disabled.
We infact had many tickets about this and hence we disabled the option while editing.]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:56:01 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7356&tpg=1#p25563
<![CDATA[PHP.ini Edit]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7381&tpg=1#p25562
I use Apache as a server, already restarted the services, but without success. Follow the screen.]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:35:57 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7381&tpg=1#p25562
<![CDATA[The viifbr0 is not started.]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7363&tpg=1#p25561
Sir, is your issue resolved? If not kindly check the eth0 config file and make sure that the gateway is present.
Also if you are using Network Interface other then eth0 then please specify that in Virtualizor panel  in Configuration >> Master Settings and then run "service virtnetwork restart".
If you still face any issue then please open a support ticket we will fix the issue.
]]>
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:18:06 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7363&tpg=1#p25561
<![CDATA[phpMyAdmin Error]]> http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7378&tpg=1#p25560 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:07:28 GMT http://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=7378&tpg=1#p25560