Softaculous

Softaculous https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php? <![CDATA[API response for listing wordpress sites returns incorrect sites]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19607&tpg=1#p59041
]]> Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:50:48 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19607&tpg=1#p59041 <![CDATA[The Benefits of Developing an ERC-6551 Token]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19624&tpg=1#p59040 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:50:51 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19624&tpg=1#p59040 <![CDATA[Set up Webuzo server as SMTP?]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19612&tpg=1#p59039 Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:33:05 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19612&tpg=1#p59039 <![CDATA[DNSSEC]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19600&tpg=1#p59038 Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:23:53 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19600&tpg=1#p59038 <![CDATA[Webuzo 4.4.6 Launched]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20001&tpg=1#p59037

Deploying non-LTS versions of services like MariaDB is not important in our industry. Deploying LTS versions quickly is important!

They should focus their efforts on deploying features that the community has been asking for for a long time and that are really important to us.

Don't get me wrong, many of these new features are great and necessary, but there are unnecessary features that should be left to community requests.

We are working hard to move from cPanel to Webuzo, but the development path of Webuzo has us thinking that maybe Directadmin will be the best option in the long term.

https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19393https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19393]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 19:41:19 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20001&tpg=1#p59037 <![CDATA[I have gretap tunnel, but the vm: [error] Error: [0] Cannot read from socket]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20009&tpg=1#p59036
I have gretap tunnel, but the vm [error] Error: [0] Cannot read from socket

Hi, can I ask for some help? I have gretap tunnel, but sometimes ping throws an error and slows down the internet.. What could be the problem? Error: Latency: FAILED [error] Cannot read: or [error] Trying to get interface information on non-initialized socket. Packet Loss: 4.7%

could you help me thank you very much

my vps server where the ip addresses are gretap:

ip link add gre4 type gretap local 134.55.55.55 remote 244.55.55.99 ttl 255

ip link set gre4 up
ip addr add 172.40.0.1/30 dev gre4

# mtu, mss fix
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu

# ip routes

ip ro a 182.54.67.75/32 dev gre4
ip ro a 182.54.67.76/32 dev gre4
ip ro a 182.54.67.77/32 dev gre4
#----------
# arp tables
arp -s 182.54.67.75 $(cat /sys/class/net/eth0/address) -i eth0 pub
arp -s 182.54.67.76 $(cat /sys/class/net/eth0/address) -i eth0 pub
arp -s 182.54.67.77 $(cat /sys/class/net/eth0/address) -i eth0 pub
on my own server gretap:

ip link add gre4 type gretap local 244.55.55.99 remote 134.55.55.55 ttl 255
ip link set gre4 up

# create br
brctl addbr viifbr0
brctl addif viifbr0 gre4
ip link set viifbr0 up

# add ip to br
ip addr add 172.40.0.2/30 dev viifbr0

# mtu, mss fix
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu

echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
MTU:
enp8s0: 1500
gre4: 1462
viifbr0: 1462
VM servers: 1450
dmesg:

[ 66.934227] systemd-journald[582]:
/var/log/journal/7029f2af40fb48f49e775ad9f6e1cacb/user-1000.journal: Journal file uses a different sequence number ID, rotating.
[ 87.340554] gre: GRE over IPv4 demultiplexor driver
[ 87.368190] ip_gre: GRE over IPv4 tunneling driver
[ 87.485386] bridge: filtering via arp/ip/ip6tables is no longer available by default. Update your scripts to load br_netfilter if you need this.
[ 87.488041] viifbr0: port 1(gre4) entered blocking state
[ 87.488048] viifbr0: port 1(gre4) entered disabled state
[ 87.488058] gre4: entered allmulticast mode
[ 87.488120] gre4: entered promiscuous mode
[ 87.490665] viifbr0: port 1(gre4) entered blocking state
[ 87.490674] viifbr0: port 1(gre4) entered forwarding state
Netplan:

network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp8s0:
dhcp4: no
addresses:
- 244.55.55.99/24
routes:
- to: default
via: 244.55.55.1
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4]

Resolv:

nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 19:36:48 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20009&tpg=1#p59036 <![CDATA[Free credit for cloud users]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59035
However after a new user has signed up and logged in, they are presented with um..... nothing.. no plans, and no idea what they should pay money for (so they dont), so we added the plans so they could see, and then when they click on any of them, they are asked to topup, this works fine.

But, it would be ideal and simpler if we could add a default minimal amount so that the plans show and they can trial the service.

Editing the default cur_bal in the user mysql structue should work, but it doesnt transpose to the users data for some reason, is there a cache ??

Thanks

Bill]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:34:50 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59035 <![CDATA[Free credit for cloud users]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59034

You can add transaction for the specific user from Admin panel->Billing->Add transaction.

]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:23:32 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59034 <![CDATA[Free credit for cloud users]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59033
Ive tried modifying the cur_bal deafult in the users table but it doesnt work, and I see there are no hooks for a new user login.

Should be simple...

]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 11:25:48 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=20008&tpg=1#p59033 <![CDATA[How to Block Broadcast Traffic on Bridge Network]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19606&tpg=1#p59032

Quote From : mashhadhost August 31, 2024, 6:17 pm

Hi everyone,

We're having an issue with broadcast traffic on our bridge network. All virtual machines (VMs) connected to this bridge are receiving broadcast traffic, which is being counted in their traffic usage reports. This is causing inaccuracies and dissatisfaction among users.

Does anyone have a solution for blocking broadcast traffic between VMs on a bridge network or excluding this internal traffic from the usage calculations?

Thanks in advance!
https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php geometry dash

Hello! Have you thought about segmenting the traffic using VLANs? By doing this, you can better segregate broadcast traffic between your bridge network's virtual machines. Additionally, it could be beneficial to see if your hypervisor offers the ability to filter or limit broadcast traffic. Tell us how it turns out!]]> Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:24:13 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=19606&tpg=1#p59032