General Support (Softaculous) https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?fid=16 <![CDATA[Virtualizor API Issue]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15205&tpg=1#p45923
 I'm trying to create a custom button on WHMCS Admin Panel called as "Rebuild", only to the Admin user be able to rebuild a VPS with easy mode, because I do not use "User Rebuilt" on VPS panel to prevent any errors that the customer can do.

I'm trying to use ADMIN API, but when I call the function, the system return this error: https://puu.sh/Dt6fR/84a806575a.png, say me this reason: "The VPS ID doesn't exists"


 My questions is:


1. The Virtualizor admin API only work if the VPS is in Master server?

2. Can you check if have some error in this simple code? https://puu.sh/Dt6N7/eb597c694a.png

On error log,  it returns all data from the VPS as correct informations, but it simply doesn't process.]]>
Thu, 16 May 2019 16:15:33 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15205&tpg=1#p45923
<![CDATA[I created a docker container for the master server]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15200&tpg=1#p45905
If this sounds like it would be useful for you, you can find it on docker hub or github nottt/virtualizor. I'd link it but I can't because I'm new

Feel free to create a issue in the repo if you have any.

I believe they should start releasing everything as a docker, because it makes it easier for everyone, including them.

Even windows can run docker nowadays, and it makes sure everyone have a consistent experience. ]]>
Tue, 14 May 2019 07:51:35 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15200&tpg=1#p45905
<![CDATA[Access admin panel using https + own domain]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15198&tpg=1#p45902
I just want to access the same admin I with ip:4084 but using my own domain and https...because it's a master server only and I have no need for the other web UI]]>
Tue, 14 May 2019 02:40:14 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15198&tpg=1#p45902
<![CDATA[Is it possible to run virtualizor in a different server than my VPS?]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15193&tpg=1#p45878
What I have in mind is something like this:

Virtualizor running in a server dedicated for itself

Install VPS to other servers from the internet.

The benefits would be not using resources on the server I want to use a VM (i.e the entire server hardware can be dedicated to running the VM) and then if something happens to my server, virtualizor is still fine]]>
Sun, 12 May 2019 10:26:33 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15193&tpg=1#p45878
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45877 netcut i guess. due to one of our client.
so badddd]]>
Sun, 12 May 2019 04:49:38 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45877
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45869 i can see ip address for example new /29 assign to that virtualizor server..
arp list shows dynamic connected with particular mac address.. (i dont know who belong that mac address)..
the new ip /29 has not added to pool.. but they seems detect with particular mac address..

when i assign /29 to another server.. yes the mac address is indeed empty.

i still curious why..
seems the ip does not resolved with ARP because double mac address..
still no idea why]]>
Sat, 11 May 2019 01:33:36 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45869
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45846
Quote From : empiretech May 9, 2019, 3:15 pm
Sounds like more like an ARP issue  with your provider or possibly with your node  than an issue with with  Virtualizor


on the centos 7.1  VM    when you have a Dead secondary IP  do a
ifup eth0:X     
changing the X of course to the real interface  and see if the IP comes up 

you may have to contact your provider to investigate  to see if its holding the ARP on the router







yes ifdown and ifup eth0:X back to working again..

also i check from router.. yes the ARP show the ip with old mac address (old VM).
so i remove the ARP and they correct new mac address and start working normal.

do u think that the issue due to bad LAN cable? i check from the node.. rx error always increasing..]]>
Fri, 10 May 2019 02:20:01 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45846
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45841

on the centos 7.1  VM    when you have a Dead secondary IP  do a
ifup eth0:X     
changing the X of course to the real interface  and see if the IP comes up 

you may have to contact your provider to investigate  to see if its holding the ARP on the router





]]>
Thu, 09 May 2019 15:15:51 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45841
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45817  the vm that only work with first ip address.. meanwhile other additional ip address are not working..
 after couple hours.. they seems working as well right now.. so all ip are working..
 but why i have to wait many hours later to make it work?? also if i reboot the VM, the second and 3rd ip will stop working and need to wait couple hours again..

 however, if u use centos 7,6.. all ip directly start working without no issue and no need to wait anything..

 any update from developer.. please fix that asap..]]>
Wed, 08 May 2019 11:37:20 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45817
<![CDATA[issue with multiple ip within one VM]]> https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45815 eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet xxxx  netmask 255.255.255.192  broadcast xxx
        inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe0b:11e1  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:16:3e:0b:11:e1  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 331  bytes 29550 (29.5 KB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 174  bytes 37153 (37.1 KB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 678

eth0:0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet xxx  netmask 255.255.255.192  broadcast xxx
        ether 00:16:3e:0b:11:e1  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)


but this collisions does not appear in centos.
hemm.. does this a bug? only working with primary ip address, and the additional ip is on that vps (installed) but no internet access at all..
]]>
Wed, 08 May 2019 07:52:21 GMT https://www.softaculous.com/board/index.php?tid=15171&tpg=1#p45815