Webuzo + Nginx

You are here: Index > Webuzo > Suggestions > Topic : Webuzo + Nginx

Poll

Poll Question : Do you want Webuzo to support nginx?

Yes, Definetly Urgent! (21)	(100%)
Na, Webuzo is just fine. (0)	(0%)
Maybe! (0)	(0%)
Total Votes : 21

Threaded Mode | Print

Webuzo + Nginx, It is a most have (21 Replies, Read 18187 times)

backhost	# December 20, 2012, 7:55 pm
Group: Member Post Group: Newbie Posts: 9 Status:	Webuzo would be awesome if it could carry nginx, its all it need to completly replace cpanel/directadmin it will have nothing to envy from those 2.
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Elwave	# December 20, 2012, 8:23 pm \| Post: 1
Group: Member Post Group: Newbie Posts: 2 Status:	I second this motion!
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

valley	# December 21, 2012, 4:56 am \| Post: 2
Group: Webuzo Team Post Group: Super Member Posts: 1644 Status:	Hi, It will be available ASAP. ----------------------- Webuzo : Single User Control Panel Join Webuzo : Facebook Twitter
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

backhost	# December 21, 2012, 5:05 am \| Post: 3
Group: Member Post Group: Newbie Posts: 9 Status:	Oh yea Any ETA Can you move this to webuzo forum I posted it on wrong section Thanks Erick
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

divij	# December 21, 2012, 7:37 am \| Post: 4
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 290 Status:	Hi, Sir we are working on it and it is in testing phase. It will be available in upcoming version. Edited by Moderator : December 21, 2012, 8:51 am
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Kynao	# January 6, 2013, 10:39 am \| Post: 5
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 489 Status:	I suggest ISPConfig http://www.ispconfig.org/ as a control panel to be supported. It's free. Web server management (Apache2 and Full support for Nginx webserver) ISPconfig cluster with high availability and failover Manage multiple servers from one control panel ... ISPConfig 3.0.5 RC 1 is promising.
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Brijesh	# January 7, 2013, 5:18 am \| Post: 6
Group: Softaculous Team Post Group: Super Member Posts: 5647 Status:	Quote From : Kynao January 6, 2013, 10:39 am I suggest ISPConfig http://www.ispconfig.org/ as a control panel to be supported. Hi, Webuzo is a standalone Softaculous and does not require any panel. Edited by Brijesh : January 7, 2013, 5:19 am ----------------------- Webuzo - Multi User Hosting Control Panel AMPPS - Best WordPress/PHP/MySQL development tool
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Kynao	# January 7, 2013, 8:11 pm \| Post: 7
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 489 Status:	Will we have PHP-FPM + APC along nginx ?
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Kynao	# January 7, 2013, 8:19 pm \| Post: 8
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 489 Status:	I suggest ModSecurity for Nginx
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

divij	# January 8, 2013, 5:25 am \| Post: 9
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 290 Status:	Hi, Sir thanks for the suggestion we are working on it.
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Kynao	# January 8, 2013, 5:32 am \| Post: 10
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 489 Status:	On PHP-FPM + APC or ModSecurity ?
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

ewwink	# January 19, 2013, 10:58 am \| Post: 11
Group: Member Post Group: Newbie Posts: 23 Status:	Plus +1 for: Apache > Varnish > Nginx = Webuzo FYI: APC, Xcache, eaccelerator will not work with mod_suphp but there is alternative is using FastCGI
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

valley	# January 21, 2013, 4:10 am \| Post: 12
Group: Webuzo Team Post Group: Super Member Posts: 1644 Status:	Hi, It will be implemented ASAP. ----------------------- Webuzo : Single User Control Panel Join Webuzo : Facebook Twitter
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

ewwink	# January 21, 2013, 6:42 am \| Post: 13
Group: Member Post Group: Newbie Posts: 23 Status:	Quote From : valley January 21, 2013, 4:10 am Hi, It will be implemented ASAP. great news benchmark test VPS Specs: - Processor 1 Core 2094 MHz - Memory 768mb - OS centos 6.3 64 bit - Apache 2.2.15 - varnish 3.0.3 - Nginx 1.2.6 - Worpress blog - command: ab -n 1000 -c 2 http://ip:port Apache Time taken for tests: 197.883 seconds Total transferred: 283000 bytes HTML transferred: 0 bytes Requests per second: 5.05 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 395.765 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 197.883 [ms] (mean, across Transfer rate: 1.40 [Kbytes/sec] received varnish -> Apache Time taken for tests: 0.202 seconds Total transferred: 362990 bytes HTML transferred: 0 bytes Requests per second: 1834.67 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 1.090 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.202 [ms] (mean, across all Transfer rate: 650.36 [Kbytes/sec] received Nginx -> varnish -> Apache Time taken for tests: 0.562 seconds Total transferred: 41781000 bytes HTML transferred: 41425000 bytes Requests per second: 1780.20 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 1.123 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.562 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 72635.37 [Kbytes/sec] received
IP: --

Webuzo + Nginx

Kynao	# January 21, 2013, 8:15 am \| Post: 14
Group: Member Post Group: Elite Member Posts: 489 Status:	Isn't it an overkill to have both Apache / nginx and varnish ? or is it worth it ? Did you test to suppress Apache of the mix for example ?
IP: --

« Previous Next »

Threaded Mode | Print

Jump To :

Users viewing this topic
	1 guests, 0 users.

All times are GMT. The time now is April 19, 2024, 2:05 am.

Powered By AEF 1.0.8 © 2007-2008 Electron Inc.

Queries: 12 | Page Created In:0.027